American conservatives long admired England as the homeland of Civilized Standards. Russell Kirk wrote a whole book on America's British Culture because he wanted to refute multiculturalism. It's worth noting though how their ideas of civilized standards now operate:
What happened? Civilized Standards are a good thing, but today they just don't work as a final standard. The Brits have preferred to avoid ultimate issues because they might lead to unpleasantness, relying instead on habit, moderation and social convention -- "civilized standards." That's fine if you have a settled class structure, an established Church, and a population that mostly stays put for a thousand years and more. When those things disappear settled standards go too, unless there's something definite to anchor them, and all that's left is the desire to avoid unpleasantness. As a result, avoiding any suggestion that there are standards becomes the only standard. That isn't enough for civilized life, though, so in the end the cult of Standards -- "internationally-recognized standards of human rights," for example -- becomes the enemy of any civilized existence. You can't do things well if you don't know what you're doing, and in life there's no substitute for having a definite position on what life is all about.