Reply to comment

nominalism

I'm out of my element, having no formal training in philosophy, but I think Francis Martin addresses your concern directly in "The Feminist Question" -- where he blames the the insidiousness of nominalism and modernism on the exclusion of women from the academy beginning in 1215. Not only did the academy suffer from the integrated thought that women brought to their inquiry, but their marginalisation limited their own proper formation. The academy suffered, women suffered, inhinged fragmentation ensued.

JP2 always emphasises one reference point to fix what ails you: go to the Garden before the fall. There is nothing perfect after that, and no one generation carries within it enough truth to inoculate against more lies. As you know, the entire "theology of the body" is encapsulated in early Genesis -- bearing all we need to know about healthy complementarity between men and women. Pax.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <acronym> <address> <b> <blockquote> <br> <br> <cite> <code> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <i> <img> <li> <ol> <p> <p> <pre> <pre> <q> <strike> <strong> <sub> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <u> <ul>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options