Yesterday I searched for Belgian sites mentioning the accusations against Paul Belien which have been made in connection with the tragic racially-motivated shootings by the Antwerp skinhead teenager. At the first site I came across, the reader was invited to submit a comment. I submitted the following (below). Yesterday was Sunday but right now in Belgium it's nearly 3 o'clock Monday afternoon and the site still hasn't posted it. I strongly doubt they will, as it'll certainly be considered "hate speech" of the most vile sort -- and furthermore, allowing it to appear in their pages might expose them to prosecution.
There's nothing wrong with a people, a race, defending its racial and ethnocultural identity by questioning government policy permitting incompatible immigration, a policy amounting to forced replacement of the country's traditional race by another one or other ones. The percentages of incompatibles are too low at present to talk of "replacement" but they won't remain low. [Here I'm talking about Belgium. The same applies to all other countries of Europe now undergoing a crisis of excessive incompatible immigration.] And if we wait instead of addressing the problem now it'll be too late to prevent the effective transformation of Flanders and Wallonia into Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Black Africa. Do Belgians wish to undergo this racial transformation? What's in place to prevent it? Nothing. Not only that, but it's forbidden to speak of it in public, on pain of being accused of "racism" and "inciting hatred." It's not "racist" to oppose the racial transformation of one's country. It's the most normal thing in the world. "Racism" is being mean or unjust toward another on account of his race. Opposing the disappearance of one's own race harms or wrongs no one. Furthermore, it's no one's business except the members of the race in question, who are only trying to defend themselves. All immigration of non-Europeans into Belgium has to end, and those already admitted must be encouraged to return home through generous financial reimbursements until they're gone and the racial/ethnocultural status quo ante is restored. The "racists" and those who "incite hatred" aren't the Vlaams Belang but they who attack the Vlaams Belang. They are the true -- and the only -- "racists."
______
(This comment was not meant in any way to implicate Paul Belien in the kind of notion of race which I discuss. I've never seen him refer to that notion. Rather, it is strictly my own way of viewing the situation. Yes the language I use is strong for some ears. I see no way around that: these things used to be understood without making them explicit but the other side has devoted itself these forty years to forcing us to either make them explicit or perish by the consequences of not so doing. I regret that very much.)
________________________
The other side doesn't engage contrary views, it muzzles them
Yesterday I searched for Belgian sites mentioning the accusations against Paul Belien which have been made in connection with the tragic racially-motivated shootings by the Antwerp skinhead teenager. At the first site I came across, the reader was invited to submit a comment. I submitted the following (below). Yesterday was Sunday but right now in Belgium it's nearly 3 o'clock Monday afternoon and the site still hasn't posted it. I strongly doubt they will, as it'll certainly be considered "hate speech" of the most vile sort -- and furthermore, allowing it to appear in their pages might expose them to prosecution.
Here's the comment I submitted:
Il n'y a rien de mal de la part d'un peuple, de la part d'une race, à défendre son identité raciale et ethnoculturelle, donc de poser des questions au sujet d'une politique gouvernementale permettant l'immigration incompatible, une politique qui revient au remplacement forcé de la race traditionelle du pays par une autre race ou des autres races. Les pourcentages des incompatibles en ce moment sont trop peu élevés que pour permettre de parler de «remplacement» mais ils ne resteront pas bas. Ils augmenteront, et si l'on attend au lieu d'aborder le sujet maintenant, il sera trop tard pour empêcher la transformation effective de la Flandre et de la Wallonie au Maroc, en Algérie, en Tunisie, et en Afrique noir. Veut-on que la Belgique subisse cette transformation raciale? Qu'est-ce qu'il y a en place pour l'empêcher? Rien. Non seulement cela, mais il est interdit, sous peine d'accusation de «racisme» et «d'incitation à la haine», d'en parler en public. Refuser la transformation raciale de son pays n'est pas «raciste». C'est la chose la plus normale au monde. Le «racisme» c'est être méchant ou injuste envers quelqu'un à cause de sa race. S'opposer à la disparition de sa propre race ne blesse ni ne fait aucun tort à personne. Et de surcroît, cela ne regard personne sauf les membres de la race en question qui ne cherchent qu'à se défendre. Toute immigration en Belgique de gens non-Européans doit cesser, et ceux déjà admis doivent être encouragés de rentrer chez eux par le truchement de remboursements financiers généreux jusqu'à ce qu'ils soient tous partis et que le status quo ante racial et ethnoculturel soit restauré. Les «racistes» et ceux qui «incitent à la haine» ne sont pas le Vlaams Belang mais bien au contraire ceux qui attaquent le Vlaams Belang. Voilà les vrais -- et les seuls -- «racistes».
It says:
There's nothing wrong with a people, a race, defending its racial and ethnocultural identity by questioning government policy permitting incompatible immigration, a policy amounting to forced replacement of the country's traditional race by another one or other ones. The percentages of incompatibles are too low at present to talk of "replacement" but they won't remain low. [Here I'm talking about Belgium. The same applies to all other countries of Europe now undergoing a crisis of excessive incompatible immigration.] And if we wait instead of addressing the problem now it'll be too late to prevent the effective transformation of Flanders and Wallonia into Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Black Africa. Do Belgians wish to undergo this racial transformation? What's in place to prevent it? Nothing. Not only that, but it's forbidden to speak of it in public, on pain of being accused of "racism" and "inciting hatred." It's not "racist" to oppose the racial transformation of one's country. It's the most normal thing in the world. "Racism" is being mean or unjust toward another on account of his race. Opposing the disappearance of one's own race harms or wrongs no one. Furthermore, it's no one's business except the members of the race in question, who are only trying to defend themselves. All immigration of non-Europeans into Belgium has to end, and those already admitted must be encouraged to return home through generous financial reimbursements until they're gone and the racial/ethnocultural status quo ante is restored. The "racists" and those who "incite hatred" aren't the Vlaams Belang but they who attack the Vlaams Belang. They are the true -- and the only -- "racists."
______
(This comment was not meant in any way to implicate Paul Belien in the kind of notion of race which I discuss. I've never seen him refer to that notion. Rather, it is strictly my own way of viewing the situation. Yes the language I use is strong for some ears. I see no way around that: these things used to be understood without making them explicit but the other side has devoted itself these forty years to forcing us to either make them explicit or perish by the consequences of not so doing. I regret that very much.)
________________________
Long live free Flanders!
________________________